Amid wildfire smoke, Phillies’ bats are stifled in 4-1 loss to Mets in the first game after the All-Star break 38%

By Scott Lauber43%

7/16/2026, 6:13:41 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 1,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,104 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,659 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the article peer group.

Amid wildfire smoke, Phillies’ bats are stifled in 4-1 loss to Mets in the first game after the All-Star break 
For the fifth consecutive season, the Phillies lost the first game after the break, with the Phillies' lone run coming from Trea Turner's two-out eighth inning home run. 
After coming up for air from the All-Star break one day sooner than usual, the Phillies played through smoke-filled air that only worsened Thursday night. 
It didn’t bother Aaron Nola. 
His teammates? 
Put it this way: Although the Phillies didn’t cite the campfire that hung over Citizens Bank Park as an excuse, the only thing more suffocating was the blanket flung over their bats by a handful of Mets pitchers in a 4-1 loss to open the season’s symbolic, if not mathematical second half. 
“The weather was a bit different tonight, but it played no part in the final result,” Brandon Marsh said. 
“We just didn’t play as good as we should have, you know? 
Yeah, we’ve just got to be better.” 
» READ MORE: Phillies reliever Brad Keller expected to miss rest of the season with torn elbow ligament 
For the fifth consecutive season, the Phillies lost the first game after the All-Star break. 
This year, they managed four hits, with only Trea Turner’s two-out homer in the eighth inning keeping them from getting shut out for the eighth time. 
Nola weaved in and out of trouble and allowed one run through six innings. 
But when interim manager Don Mattingly sent him back out for the seventh, at 90 pitches and against the bottom of the Mets’ order, he gave up back-to-back homers to Brett Baty and Francisco Alvarez. 
It was the reverse of Nola’s last start on July 10, when Mattingly pulled the veteran righty after five innings and 84 pitches in a 2-2 game. 
Lefty reliever Tim Mayza gave up five runs in the sixth, and the Phillies lost. 
“So, I take him out too early, leave him in too long,” Mattingly said, smiling, but also claiming that his quick hook with Nola last time didn’t factor into his decision-making. 
“Honestly, you really take each game for what it is. 
If he would have struggled in the sixth, then I would have been more proactive. 
But he threw the ball so good in the sixth  I felt good about him right there.” 
It marked Nola’s third consecutive solid start, a positive development for the back end of the rotation on a day when the bullpen lost setup man Brad Keller for the season with a torn elbow ligament. 
The Phillies and Mets had their All-Star break shortened by one day when ESPN chose them in the offseason for a standalone national broadcast. 
The rest of the sport returns from the break Friday, as usual. 
And a few minutes before 4 p.m., the teams were told the start of the game would be moved up to 6:10 p.m.  one hour earlier than scheduled  because the air quality was expected to worsen after sunset. 
The forecast proved correct. 
When the game started, the air quality index was at 157, according to airnow.gov, categorized as “unhealthy.” 
It rose to 166 by 8 p.m., with the Center City skyline no longer visible from South Philly. 
By 9 p.m., it was 192. 
» READ MORE: Baseball celebrated itself with All-Star Week. 
Next up: Avoiding self-destruction with a looming labor fight 
“It’s not ideal,” Nola said. 
“But it is what it is. 
Can’t really do anything about it. 
It’s one of those days where it was smoky. 
But I mean, it’s an outdoor stadium. 
You’ve got to get the game in and play through different conditions.” 
Marsh said home-plate umpire Dan Iassogna, also the crew chief, repeatedly asked players throughout the game if they didn’t feel well or if the conditions were disruptive in the game. 
“Yeah, multiple times they were checking with us, asking us players  which was cool to see  if we were good to go, and obviously we were all ready to go,“ Marsh said. 
”That was good by them. 
I wasn’t expecting that, but that was good." 
Mattingly said there was discussion earlier in the day about whether the game should be played. 
But based on forecasting, league and team officials were confident they could get it in, albeit earlier than expected. 
But the Phillies and Mets altered their pregame routines in other ways. 
Neither team took batting practice on the field and spent “as little time as possible on the field,” Mattingly said. 
“Just doing what you absolutely feel like you have to do after being gone for three days,” he added. 
“Not trying to absorb a bunch of energy when you’re getting heated.” 
The Phillies were muted by Mets starter Christian Scott and four relievers. 
They had one hit through three innings and failed to capitalize on Bryce Harper’s one-out double in the fourth and a two-out double by Kyle Schwarber that missed being a homer by inches in the sixth. 
» READ MORE: Mike Trout said he loves Philly during Monday’s All-Star festivities. 
But he seems no closer to playing here. 
Nola, meanwhile, continued to have success by leaning on his signature curveball and changeups to left-handed hitters. 
Fifty-nine of his 97 pitches were off-speed compared to only 19 four-seam fastballs and 15 sinkers. 
In his last three starts, Nola has given up eight runs in 18 innings to leave his ERA at 5.68. 
“Stuff feels pretty good,” he said. 
“Solo home runs is hurting me, but other than that, body and stuff is pretty good. 
Overall, I feel like I’m getting ahead in the counts and getting earlier outs and going a little bit deeper in the games.” 
The Phillies could take a measure of consolation in that, maybe when the smoke clears. 
Ryan Howard was a three-time All-Star and champion of the 2006 Home Run Derby in his legendary run with the Phillies. 
With the baseball world coming together in Philadelphia for the 96th All-Star Game, Howard sat down with Phillies Extra to discuss his All-Star memories, his expectations for a Home Run Derby at Citizens Bank Park, his outlook on the Phillies' season, Kyle Schwarber's chances of breaking his single-season franchise mark for homers, and more. 
Watch here. 
You can also subscribe to the podcast version of Phillies Extra on Spotify or Apple Podcasts. 
Previous episodes: Dan Baker | Ricky Bottalico | Preston Mattingly | Caleb Cotham | Larry Bowa | Joe Maddon | Rhys Hoskins | Terry Francona | Aaron Rowand 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.0%Scott Lauber: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias3.0%This article: 2.2%Scott Lauber: 1.2%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias2.2%This article: 5.0%Scott Lauber: 1.9%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.8%Scott Lauber: 1.4%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.8%This article: 3.4%Scott Lauber: 0.8%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias3.4%This article: 7.1%Scott Lauber: 5.9%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.5%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.9%Scott Lauber: 1.1%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Scott Lauber: 4.3%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias7.9%This article: 0.7%Scott Lauber: 1.2%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.7%This article: 9.3%Scott Lauber: 8.0%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias9.3%This article: 8.8%Scott Lauber: 3.3%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias8.8%This article: 3.2%Scott Lauber: 1.6%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error3.2%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Scott Lauber: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Scott Lauber: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Scott Lauber: 2.3%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.3%Scott Lauber: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority3.3%This article: 0.2%Scott Lauber: 1.3%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma0.2%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.7%Scott Lauber: 2.5%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization3.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.7%Scott Lauber: 1.3%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion4.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.0%Scott Lauber: 2.6%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.1%Scott Lauber: 1.0%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal2.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.7%Scott Lauber: 0.3%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.1%Scott Lauber: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground1.1%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.4%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.1%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.7%Scott Lauber: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote1.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.9%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.7%Scott Lauber: 2.9%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice4.7%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Lauber: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Scott Lauber: 3.5%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.0%

1104 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers31%attributed speech758writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 100.0% coverageBrandon Marsh • 19 words • 100.0% coverageBrandon Marsh • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Marsh • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Marsh • 30 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Marsh • 34 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Marsh • 5 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Marsh • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDon Mattingly • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAaron Nola • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Aaron Nola

63%flagged-word coverage
90 attributed words26% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -17.4 ptsWriter: 17.4%Aaron Nola: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Aaron Nola: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.