Topic summary
27% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philadelphia 76ers results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 1,410 hits . Analysis detected 14,472 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,154 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (15,280 of 16,517 topics). This Philadelphia 76ers is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Philadelphia 76ers
Topic details
Total words: 21,154
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst