Topic summary
⁠40%2 analyzed articles/videos1,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peptides results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 4,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,235 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (8,949 of 15,753 topics). This Peptides is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Peptides
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,235
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Middle Ground: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos