Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Negotiations Process results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.9% saturation with 443 hits . Analysis detected 2,240 faulty-reasoning hits from 888 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.6% and a BS Rank of 95% (783 of 15,753 topics). This Peace Negotiations Process is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group. Peace Negotiations Process
Topic details
Total words: 888
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.0% percentile 12.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles888 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 49.9% 49.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 24.4% 24.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 26.4% 26.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 19.8% 19.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 49.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 25.1%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 24.4%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst