Topic summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos1,498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parasites results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 3,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,494 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,316 of 16,559 topics). This Parasites is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Parasites
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos