Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil And Gasoline results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 1,318 hits. Analysis detected 8,903 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,540 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,118 of 15,780 topics). This Oil And Gasoline is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Oil And Gasoline
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,540
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.1%20.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 10.2%10.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos