Topic summary
35% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil And Gas results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 3,148 hits . Analysis detected 22,702 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,132 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,999 of 16,562 topics). This Oil And Gas is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Oil And Gas
Topic details
Total words: 33,132
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles33.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst