Topic summary
68% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,312 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obama Presidential Center results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 4,094 hits . Analysis detected 28,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,799 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,093 of 15,399 topics). This Obama Presidential Center is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Obama Presidential Center
Topic details
Total words: 23,799
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst