Topic summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obama Administration results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 1,904 hits. Analysis detected 13,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,398 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (5,267 of 16,562 topics). This Obama Administration is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Obama Administration
Topic details
Total words: 7,398
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.7%25.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.8%8.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos