Topic summary
⁠61%3 analyzed articles/videos746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Deal results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,613 hits. Analysis detected 16,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,240 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,382 of 16,562 topics). This Nuclear Deal is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Nuclear Deal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,240
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos