Author summary
85%1 analyzed article/video746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachael Larimore results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 415 hits. Analysis detected 2,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,238 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 87% (923 of 6,628 authors). This Rachael Larimore is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Rachael Larimore
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
87%Rachael Larimore (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,238
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510086.1% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 15.4%15.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 18.5%18.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 11.1%11.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 18.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Author 11.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Author 10.2%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos