Author summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachael Larimore results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 415 hits . Analysis detected 2,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,238 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 87% (923 of 6,628 authors). This Rachael Larimore is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. Rachael Larimore
Author details
Total words: 2,238
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.1% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 15.4% 15.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.5% 18.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 11.1% 11.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.9% 14.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 11.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst