Topic summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 8,584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nfl Draft results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 4,278 hits . Analysis detected 32,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,831 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,885 of 16,560 topics). This Nfl Draft is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Nfl Draft
Topic details
Total words: 32,831
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score13 analyzed articles32.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst