OutKick88%

Deion Sanders sends message to Diego Pavia after Heisman finalist goes undrafted in 2026 NFL Draft 47%

By Amber Harding0%

4/26/2026, 9:23:21 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, In-Group Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 692 faulty-reasoning hits from 433 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (11,299 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the article peer group.

Deion Sanders knows a thing or two about the NFL Draft not going the way you expect. 
So when Diego Pavia’s name never got called this weekend, Coach Prime made sure the former Vanderbilt quarterback heard from someone who’s been there. 
Or rather, someone who’s son has been there. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON OUTKICK 
"I BELIEVE IN YOU MY MAN!" 
Sanders wrote on X. 
"Stay strong and don’t let up. 
Show them what time it is and never allow them to forget. 
Much Love & God bless you." 
It’s a pretty strong vote of confidence  and one Pavia probably needed after the last few days. 
Just months ago, the Vanderbilt standout was one of the best players in college football. 
Pavia threw for 3,539 yards and 29 touchdowns during a breakout 2025 season that earned him a trip to New York as a Heisman Trophy finalist. 
And yet, when the 2026 NFL Draft came and went, Pavia never heard his name called. 
That’s not something you see often. 
The last Heisman finalist to go undrafted was Northern Illinois quarterback Jordan Lynch in 2014. 
And you’re looking at only a handful over the last three decades. 
To be fair, there were concerns. 
Pavia measured in at just 5-foot-10, and at 24 years old, he’s already older than many incoming rookies. 
Teams have also reportedly questioned his temperament  something that became part of his flashy on-field persona over the past couple of seasons. 
DEION SANDERS WALKS BACK COMMENTS ON SON SHEDEUR SANDERS' LANDING SPOT IN NFL DRAFT 
Still, the production was there. 
The accolades were there. 
And usually, that’s enough to at least hear your name on Day 3. 
Sanders, of course, understands how unpredictable the draft process can be. 
His son, Shedeur Sanders, was widely projected as a first-round pick before sliding all the way to the fifth round in the 2025 NFL Draft. 
That fall turned into one of the biggest talking points of that draft cycle, and it clearly stuck with Deion. 
So when Pavia found himself in a similar  albeit more extreme  situation, Coach Prime stepped in to improve morale. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Now, the path forward is uncertain for Pavia. 
Whether that means catching on as an undrafted free agent, earning a camp invite or taking a less conventional route to the league, he’s got work to do. 
But at the very least, he’s got one very high-profile believer in his corner. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.2%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias1.2%This article: 4.2%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias4.2%This article: 4.2%Amber Harding: 2.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 3.0%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic3.0%This article: 4.6%Amber Harding: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 2.3%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 4.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.2%Amber Harding: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias15.2%This article: 6.0%Amber Harding: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.0%This article: 5.1%Amber Harding: 5.5%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 2.6%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Amber Harding: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error9.5%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Amber Harding: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect7.6%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%Amber Harding: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.8%Amber Harding: 2.7%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority5.8%This article: 6.5%Amber Harding: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma6.5%This article: 4.8%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope4.8%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.6%Amber Harding: 6.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization16.6%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.2%Amber Harding: 3.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion10.2%This article: 1.4%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question1.4%This article: 10.6%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.6%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.6%Amber Harding: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal4.6%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.9%Amber Harding: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.4%Amber Harding: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 8.8%Amber Harding: 12.2%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice8.8%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amber Harding: 1.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Amber Harding: 3.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.7%

433 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker7.9%attributed speech399writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageDeion Sanders • 6 words • 100.0% coverageDeion Sanders • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDeion Sanders • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDeion Sanders • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDeion Sanders • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Deion Sanders

88%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words100% of attributed speech78% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Quote-first Misdirection+17.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Deion Sanders: 17.6%17.6%Biased Writer Voice-9.5 ptsWriter: 9.5%Deion Sanders: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Deion Sanders: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.