Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heisman Trophy results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 569 hits. Analysis detected 4,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,247 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,770 of 16,562 topics). This Heisman Trophy is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Heisman Trophy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,247
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 17.5%17.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos