Author summary
ā 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,038 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Olson results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 918 hits . Analysis detected 4,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,581 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ā 91% (637 of 6,628 authors). This Eric Olson is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Eric Olson
Author details
Total words: 2,581
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.4% percentile 7.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 35.6% 35.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.3% 13.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 8.0% 8.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.3% 6.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.2% 7.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 35.6%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 17.5%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst