Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanderbilt Commodores results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Recency Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 146 hits . Analysis detected 1,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,585 of 37,204 keywords). This Vanderbilt Commodores is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Vanderbilt Commodores
Keyword details
Total words: 1,732
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst