OutKick97%
Trades Could Save NFL Draft, Which Lacks Multiple Franchise QBs And Polarizing Players, From Being A Yawner 77%
By Armando Salguero0%
4/17/2026, 5:04:39 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 1,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 823 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of 77% (5,029 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the article peer group.
The 2026 NFL draft needs some juice because it simply doesn't have the stirring traits that typically turn drafts into memorable moments we recall decades later.
A lot of big-name quarterbacks on the board?
Not this draft outside of presumptive No. 1 pick Fernando Mendoza – and even he's skipping the party in Pittsburgh next Thursday.
We aren't having a 2024 redo when a record-tying six quarterbacks were selected in the first round.
So much talent the exercise offers a future Pro Football Hall of Fame induction roster?
Well, nobody is predicting this will rival the 1983 draft when seven future Hall of Famers were selected in the first round and eight players from the draft ended up in Canton.
A compelling story that captures the imagination?
There is no polarizing Shedeur Sanders in this draft.
No enigmatic Randy Moss.
And no Laremy Tunsil once he donned his gasmask.
This draft has none of that sizzle and maybe that's one reason up to 40 percent of the hotel rooms in Pittsburgh remain unbooked for the three-day event.
So what can save the 2026 NFL draft?
Trades.
Trades, trades, trades.
And as luck might have it, there are teams more than willing to move down in the draft.
And there are teams that seemingly covet some players or positions they might be tempted to trade up for.
So this draft might be saved after all.
"I think it should be an entertaining night and there will probably be a lot of trades and that’s what I think with a draft like this, when you don’t have two or three franchise quarterbacks and a [Texans DE] Will Anderson or a [Browns DE] Myles Garrett," Kansas City Chiefs general manager Brett Veach said Thursday.
"It does lend itself to open up to a lot of fun and a lot of excitement.
From a fans' perspective, they should have a lot of fun next Thursday."
The expectation for multiple trades is so high that even general managers acknowledge it.
"I love how everybody last year thought we weren’t trading down and everybody this year assumes we are," Cleveland Browns general manager Andrew Berry said Thursday.
Teams always put out feelers to see what may be available, and this year is no different.
"We've gotten a couple calls of teams sniffing around about potentially coming up," said Giants general manager Joe Schoen, whose team has the No. 5 overall selection.
"And again, we'll just have to wait and see who's there when we pick.
I don't really foresee us moving back before next Thursday night."
The truth is this draft includes factors that might lead to trades.
There are five teams – the Jets, Browns, Chiefs, Dolphins and Cowboys – with two first round picks.
And, outside the Dolphins, who are likely not going to give up their picks in a trade-up scenario, the other teams might be tempted to use their extra resources to swing trades.
Why would teams move up?
Offensive linemen, specifically tackles, is one reason because there are a handful that are viable first-rounders and then the talent pool at the position becomes quite shallow.
So teams needing tackles might move up to get them.
"I think in some of those a couple of linemen creep in, but I do think that if they don’t creep into that first eight, nine, 10 slots, I think you’re going to get a massive run of offensive linemen from 10 to 20, 25," said Veach, who coincidentally might be in the market for a right tackle.
There's also the possibility teams will trade talented veterans during the draft.
And it seems the most likely player to be moved would be Giants nose tackle Dexter Lawrence because he wants to be traded and the situation has grown uncomfortable in the last week, with Lawrence insisting he doesn't want to be on the team anymore.
But the Giants love Lawrence as a player.
And he's got two years remaining on his contract.
So they are not gifting him to anyone.
It would require at least a first-round pick plus another pick or player to get Lawrence, per a source.
"I'm always going to pick up the phone," Schoen said.
Having said all that, we should not get carried away.
There is so far no intelligence that suggests the Browns are working to trade Myles Garrett.
The Eagles probably will trade A.J.
Brown at some point this offseason.
But salary cap considerations suggest they won't be doing that until after June 1.
And the Chargers shut down rumors receiver Quentin Johnston is about to be dealt.
"There’s a lot of rumors out there on Twitter," Chargers GM Joe Hortiz told reporters on Thursday, "but I can tell you this: I have made zero calls about Quentin, and I’ve had zero calls regarding Quentin."
Speakers
4speakers33%attributed speech553writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageBrett Veach
145 attributed words54% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.