Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fernando Mendoza results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,996 hits . Analysis detected 18,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,565 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,217 of 37,536 keywords). This Fernando Mendoza is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. Fernando Mendoza
Keyword details
Total words: 18,565
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst