Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ROB MAADDI results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 860 hits . Analysis detected 6,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,462 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,359 of 6,628 authors). This ROB MAADDI is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. ROB MAADDI
Author details
Total words: 9,462
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst