Fernando Mendoza credits his faith in God after being selected No. 1 overall by the Raiders 63%

By Lillian Mann0%

4/24/2026, 1:53:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 1,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 709 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57.8% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,202 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the article peer group.

Quarterback Fernando Mendoza, selected yesterday by the Las Vegas Raiders as the No. 1 overall pick in the 2026 NFL draft, attends a news conference at the Las Vegas Raiders Headquarters/Intermountain Health Performance Center on April 24, 2026 in Henderson, Nevada. 
(Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images) 
OAN Staff Lillian Mann 
8:53 PM  Friday, April 24, 2026 
Right after being drafted first overall in the 2026 NFL Draft by the Las Vegas Raiders, Fernando Mendoza thanked God while surrounded by his friends and family. 
After NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell called his name on Thursday, Mendoza, 22, became visibly emotional as the life-changing moment marked the culmination of a long, hard-fought journey that began at Indiana and ultimately ended with him leading the team to a national championship. 
Las Vegas calling. 
📲 #ProIU | @Raiders pic.twitter.com/rZEs7JWqex 
 Indiana Football (@IndianaFootball) April 24, 2026 
Despite being projected as the No. 1 overall pick, Mendoza did not attend the in-person draft in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, choosing instead to wait for the announcement alongside his mother, who is battling multiple sclerosis. 
“I heard my mom say, ‘I’m so proud of you’ and that kind of broke me,” Mendoza said during a Zoom interview after being drafted. 
“The last five months have been such a blessing by God, and I can’t thank him enough,” he added. 
“What a great organization, great legacy. 
There’s so many teammates I’m looking forward to talking to  coaches, owners. 
I’m ecstatic for the opportunity,” Mendoza continued. 
Mendoza’s underdog journey began as a two-star high school recruit out of Christopher Columbus High School, a path that took him to Cal Berkeley, where he spent two seasons as the starting quarterback before transferring to Indiana. 
Despite a perfect 16–0 season capped by a national championship and a Heisman Trophy, Mendoza enters the NFL carrying the same chip on his shoulder he had as a No. 250 overall recruit out of Florida in 2022. 
“I believe I’m still the underdog, although the draft was today…although I was picked today one out of 32 -I’m not one out of 32 quarterbacks at this moment. 
So, I need to work every single day possible, because I’m on the bottom of the totem pole,” Mendoza shared. 
“I’ve got to first earn the respect to my teammates, earn that equity, and I’ve also just got to immerse, and I’m just ready to do whatever the team needs and calls me to do to help them win,” he added. 
Mendoza has already begun offseason training focused on mastering West Coast offensive concepts and getting familiar with head coach Klint Kubiak’s system with the Raiders. 
“This scheme, it really allows the quarterback to be a point guard,” Mendoza said. 
“I believe that my job  we have so many great playmakers, whether from the outside, tight end, running back or offensive line, I just need to get the ball to the playmakers and do my part of the offense and be my 1/11th.” 
Mendoza is the Raiders’ first first-round quarterback selection since they drafted Louisiana State University’s (LSU) JaMarcus Russell in the 2007 NFL Draft. 
By selecting Mendoza, the franchise is looking to turn the page on years of inconsistency and reestablish a more stable identity under center. 
“Deep down, in my heart, I knew the Raiders are most likely going to be the best fit because of the coaching staff,” he said. 
“I think it really fits my play-style great, with all the great teammates on offense and defense, they’re stacked. 
 I think all the stars are aligning here, and this is a blessing, this position.” 
“I’m just looking forward to get to work, prove it at the next level,” Mendoza told ESPN. 
“College was fantastic. 
I’m so blessed to have that career. 
But now I step into a great game in the NFL. 
Look forward to proving it and earning it every single day.” 
Mendoza will compete with 15-year veteran Kirk Cousins and fourth-year player Aidan O’Connell for the Raiders’ starting quarterback position. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
What do YOU think? 
Click here to jump to the comments! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.0%Lillian Mann: 4.7%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias10.0%This article: 4.1%Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias4.1%This article: 3.1%Lillian Mann: 2.9%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic3.1%This article: 7.2%Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.2%This article: 6.1%Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias6.1%This article: 6.2%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias6.2%This article: 6.9%Lillian Mann: 8.6%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.2%Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias3.2%This article: 5.4%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect5.4%This article: 12.6%Lillian Mann: 2.4%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias12.6%This article: 2.8%Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias2.8%This article: 4.8%Lillian Mann: 8.8%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.8%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%Lillian Mann: 3.3%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect10.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 4.2%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 2.8%Lillian Mann: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma2.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 4.2%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.6%Lillian Mann: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.6%This article: 12.8%Lillian Mann: 6.7%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion12.8%This article: 3.5%Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question3.5%This article: 7.1%Lillian Mann: 2.5%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.9%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature4.9%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.2%Lillian Mann: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal6.2%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.4%Lillian Mann: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.4%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.5%Lillian Mann: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection3.5%This article: 2.3%Lillian Mann: 5.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice2.3%This article: 3.2%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination3.2%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.9%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.7%

709 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers52%attributed speech339writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLillian Mann • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageLas Vegas Raiders • 5 words • 0.0% coverageIndiana Football • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 25 words • 100.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 19 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 6 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 13 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 29 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 20 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 14 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 25 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 19 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 16 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 17 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 3 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 7 words • 100.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 11 words • 0.0% coverageFernando Mendoza • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Fernando Mendoza

85%flagged-word coverage
354 attributed words96% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Fernando Mendoza: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+7.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Fernando Mendoza: 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer Voice-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Fernando Mendoza: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-2.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Fernando Mendoza: 2.0%2.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.