Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video46.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fernando Mendoza results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Optimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 90.3% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 28 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 90.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,878 of 28,364 speakers). This Fernando Mendoza is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group.
Fernando Mendoza
Speaker details
Total words: 46.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.8% percentile
90.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 90.3%90.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 90.3%, sitewide 6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos