Topic summary
â 20% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Yankees results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 386 hits . Analysis detected 5,146 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,981 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 21% (13,076 of 16,558 topics). This New York Yankees is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. New York Yankees
Topic details
Total words: 6,981
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst