Topic summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 7,224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York County results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 3,395 hits . Analysis detected 21,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,738 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,651 of 16,339 topics). This New York County is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. New York County
Topic details
Total words: 24,738
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score16 analyzed articles24.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst