Topic summary
28% 2 analyzed articles/videos 901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Business results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 320 hits . Analysis detected 1,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,703 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,631 of 16,562 topics). This New Business is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. New Business
Topic details
Total words: 2,703
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst