Topic summary
⁠13%2 analyzed articles/videos896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nba Free Agency results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Loss Aversion, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 347 hits. Analysis detected 2,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,258 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,320 of 15,780 topics). This Nba Free Agency is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Nba Free Agency
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,258
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos