Topic summary
â 53% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Defense Authorization Act results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,194 hits . Analysis detected 14,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,943 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of â 59% (6,563 of 15,758 topics). This National Defense Authorization Act is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. National Defense Authorization Act
Topic details
Total words: 9,943
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 22.1% 22.1% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst