Topic summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 10,525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nascar results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 3,533 hits . Analysis detected 28,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,050 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,220 of 15,780 topics). This Nascar is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Nascar
Topic details
Total words: 34,050
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score16 analyzed articles34.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst