Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nasa Missions results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 678 hits . Analysis detected 2,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,316 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (13,657 of 16,562 topics). This Nasa Missions is better (less manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Nasa Missions
Topic details
Total words: 5,316
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst