After splashdown, bring in the Navy divers. 1%

By Ashley Ahn0%

4/10/2026, 5:15:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 313 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,703 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the article peer group.

The Artemis II spacecraft has splashed down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of San Diego, but there is one last step for the mission. 
The four astronauts will still be dozens of miles from land, bobbing in a spacecraft that just endured searing temperatures close to 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. 
After splashdown, five airbags on top of the Orion capsule have inflated to reorient the capsule upward in case it had landed upside down. 
The bags would also keep Orion stable through potentially rough waves or winds, as the crew awaits the recovery team. 
At this point, recovery personnel from NASA and the U.S. 
Navy will already be out at sea, tracking the capsule and other pieces of jettisoned hardware, including the three main parachutes. 
Navy divers will approach Orion aboard inflatable boats, and then check whether it is safe for the astronauts to exit. 
They will then attach an inflatable collar around the capsule to add stability and an inflatable platform, called the front porch, to help recover the astronauts. 
One by one, Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and Jeremy Hansen will then exit the capsule onto the front porch, where they will individually be lifted by helicopter and flown to the U.S.S. 
John P. 
Murtha. 
This process is expected to be completed within two hours of splashdown, according to NASA. 
The recovery team will then secure the spacecraft with a series of lines and slowly tow it to the ship, which has a well deck at the waterline to store the Orion capsule. 
Aboard the Murtha, the crew will undergo medical evaluations before returning to shore and flying to NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. 
The spacecraft, along with other recovered hardware, will also be transported to a pier at the U.S. 
Naval Base San Diego, and then eventually returned to Houston. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 2.1%The New York Times: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.5%The New York Times: 2.1%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.8%The New York Times: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.1%The New York Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 2.7%The New York Times: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Ashley Ahn: 7.2%The New York Times: 5.8%Framing Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.4%The New York Times: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.2%The New York Times: 0.4%Status Quo Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 17.9%Ashley Ahn: 3.0%The New York Times: 2.7%Optimism Bias17.9%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.7%The New York Times: 3.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Ashley Ahn: 6.7%The New York Times: 9.4%Negativity Bias8.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.8%The New York Times: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.8%The New York Times: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.1%The New York Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.8%The New York Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.5%The New York Times: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.3%The New York Times: 0.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.0%The New York Times: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.1%The New York Times: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.1%The New York Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.8%The New York Times: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.1%The New York Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.5%Ashley Ahn: 5.4%The New York Times: 4.0%Appeal to Authority11.5%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.9%The New York Times: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.8%The New York Times: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.1%The New York Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.7%The New York Times: 2.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.2%The New York Times: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 3.5%The New York Times: 3.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.8%The New York Times: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 2.9%The New York Times: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.2%The New York Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.1%The New York Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.2%The New York Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.2%The New York Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.2%The New York Times: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.8%The New York Times: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.1%The New York Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.0%The New York Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.2%The New York Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 2.4%The New York Times: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.4%The New York Times: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 15.0%Ashley Ahn: 1.0%The New York Times: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice15.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.3%The New York Times: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.4%The New York Times: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.2%The New York Times: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ashley Ahn: 0.3%The New York Times: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

313 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.