Topic summary
29% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Music Venues results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,374 hits . Analysis detected 9,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,450 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,953 of 16,562 topics). This Music Venues is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group. Music Venues
Topic details
Total words: 12,450
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.8% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst