Author summary
14% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Selena Fragassi results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 768 hits . Analysis detected 5,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,785 of 6,318 authors). This Selena Fragassi is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Selena Fragassi
Author details
Total words: 6,544
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst