Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos2,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mount Rushmore results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 745 hits. Analysis detected 7,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,748 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (12,609 of 15,447 topics). This Mount Rushmore is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Mount Rushmore
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

18% percentile
025507510018.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos