Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monaco results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 485 hits. Analysis detected 4,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,428 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,881 of 16,562 topics). This Monaco is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Monaco
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,428
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos