Topic summary
27% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,857 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Spending results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 3,266 hits . Analysis detected 25,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,586 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,117 of 15,769 topics). This Military Spending is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Military Spending
Topic details
Total words: 31,586
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score10 analyzed articles31.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst