Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sophie Jager results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Sophie Jager is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sophie Jager
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Sophie Jager (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,152
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 25.3%25.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.3%1.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 4.9%4.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 5.2%5.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos