Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dave DeCamp results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 570 hits . Analysis detected 1,694 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,235 authors). This Dave DeCamp is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Dave DeCamp
Author details
Total words: 1,432
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 39.8% 39.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.6% 8.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 13.3% 13.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 39.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst