Topic summary
⁠54%3 analyzed articles/videos1,639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Innovation results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 1,272 hits. Analysis detected 10,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,480 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,374 of 16,562 topics). This Military Innovation is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Military Innovation
Topic details
Total words: 9,480
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos