Author summary
64%4 analyzed articles/videos2,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mrigakshi Dixit results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,312 hits. Analysis detected 9,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,975 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,308 of 6,350 authors). This Mrigakshi Dixit is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Mrigakshi Dixit
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
64%Mrigakshi Dixit (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,975
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

64% percentile
025507510063.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 16.4%16.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.1%6.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 9.9%9.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate