Topic summary
⁠50%3 analyzed articles/videos3,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Industrial Complex results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 5,482 hits. Analysis detected 28,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,384 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,929 of 16,562 topics). This Military Industrial Complex is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Military Industrial Complex
Topic details
Total words: 25,384
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles25.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.6%21.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos