Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Families results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,227 hits. Analysis detected 9,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,731 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,423 of 16,562 topics). This Military Families is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Military Families
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos