Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 722 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kassie Bracken results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 478 hits . Analysis detected 2,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,523 of 6,364 authors). This Kassie Bracken is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Kassie Bracken
Author details
Total words: 2,888
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst