Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Midtown Manhattan results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 299 hits. Analysis detected 1,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (14,331 of 15,689 topics). This Midtown Manhattan is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group.
Midtown Manhattan
Topic details
Total words: 4,560
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751008.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos