Topic summary
80%26 analyzed articles/videos41,975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Midterms results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 16,897 hits. Analysis detected 153,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 147,034 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,561 of 16,129 topics). This Midterms is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score26 analyzed articles147K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Jon Ossoff Fires Back at Report Trump Will Announce His Georgia Win Was ‘Illegitimate’: ‘Donald Trump’s Spiral Continues’89%
Mediaite71%By Kathianne Boniello85%7/14/2026, 12:41:41 PM
Trump resurrects oldest GOP scare tactic over democratic socialist wins80%
Salon.com76%By Heather Digby Parton93%7/7/2026, 12:37:37 PM
Impeachment is the only answer to Trump’s behavior74%
Salon.com76%By Heather Digby Parton93%6/28/2026, 10:45:14 AM
Susie Wiles: The ‘Remarkable’ Constant in Trump’s White House79%
Newsweek34%By Jasmine Laws0%6/25/2026, 9:00:00 AM
Graham Platner Is Forcing Centrist Dems to Reckon With “Vote Blue No Matter Who”80%
The Intercept80%By Eoin Higgins0%5/28/2026, 8:51:59 PM
‘There are two tracks’: Inside the White House’s struggle to keep Trump on message47%
MS NOW95%By Jake Traylor85%5/28/2026, 9:00:00 AM
AIPAC, AI, Crypto and Gambling Are Hiding Their Big Election Spends
The Intercept80%By The Intercept Briefing53%5/22/2026, 10:00:00 AM
Pennsylvania Primary Results: Philadelphia Voters Could Send the Next Squad Member to Congress32%
The Intercept80%By Akela Lacy76% Jessica Washington65%5/20/2026, 12:22:23 AM
Rep. Thomas Massie Loses His Seat in a Win for Trump — and AIPAC76%
The Intercept80%By Matt Sledge62%5/19/2026, 11:59:16 PM
Who’s Spending in Your Congressional Election? We Tracked the Front Groups Fueling the 2026 Midterms.34%
The Intercept80%By Matt Sledge62%5/18/2026, 9:48:00 AM