Topic summary
30% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle Eastern Politics results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,437 hits . Analysis detected 11,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,046 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,939 of 16,503 topics). This Middle Eastern Politics is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Middle Eastern Politics
Topic details
Total words: 14,046
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles14K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst