Topic summary
30%3 analyzed articles/videos4,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle Eastern Politics results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,437 hits. Analysis detected 11,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,046 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,939 of 16,503 topics). This Middle Eastern Politics is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Middle Eastern Politics
Topic details
Total words: 14,046
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos