BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 70.1% saturation with 382 hits. Analysis detected 1,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 545 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,581 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the article peer group.
Since 28 February, the American and Israeli air forces have killed key leaders of Iran’s regime, levelled its military-industrial complex, and badly mauled its armed forces.
But in the battle of wills between Trump and the rulers in Tehran, the Iranians have won a clear victory.
This victory is embodied in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed by the leaders of the two countries on Thursday, and in the way that Israel was completely sidelined while that document was being negotiated.
The Americans and Israelis went to war in February with three goals—to overthrow the ayatollahs’ messianic and totalitarian regime (an aim not explicitly declared but clearly apparent even so); to eradicate Iran’s nuclear-arms project; and to destroy Iran’s ballistic-missile capabilities.
The MoU demonstrates that none of these objectives has been achieved and that Trump has no intention of restarting the war to achieve them, even though he continues to bluster about sending Iran back to the Stone Age if the Islamic Republic fails to behave itself.
The most obvious failure is the non-attainment of the US-Israeli objective to destroy Iran’s ballistic-missile arsenal.
During the war, Iran deployed those missiles (and its drones) to excellent effect, cowing its Sunni Gulf neighbours—Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Oman—so thoroughly that they began to plead and demand that America and Israel halt the bombing campaign.
Israel, which remained uncowed, nonetheless suffered serious economic damage from the five hundred or so missiles that Iran sent its way.
Iran refused to even discuss the ballistic-missile issue with the American negotiators, which is why it appears nowhere in the MoU.
During a press conference on Wednesday, Trump absurdly declared that it would be unfair to strip Iran of every ballistic missile since its neighbours have them.
(With characteristic ignorance, he compared Iran’s stocks to those of “Qatar and Saudi Arabia,” even though the Saudis have only thirty antiquated Chinese ballistic missiles, none of which was used during the war, and Qatar possesses none at all.)
Mentions of regime change—which Israel and the US had hoped would follow from the assassination of most of Iran’s military and political leadership, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, on day one of the war—are also absent from the MoU.
To the contrary, Clause 2 of the agreement implicitly accepts the continued rule of the ayatollahs and their henchmen, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, when it states:
The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.
This runs contrary to Trump’s promise to rescue the Iranian people, after Tehran slaughtered tens of thousands of unarmed anti-regime demonstrators back in January–February.
Clauses 6, 7, 10, and 11 of the MoU commit Trump to dropping all economic sanctions and actively promoting a US$300 billion plan to reconstruct and develop Iran—money that will ensure the regime’s economic stability and longevity.
(Observers have long argued that only severe economic distress could cause mass disaffection and bring about protests that would topple the regime.)
Of course, the promised financial largesse will also enable Iran to rebuild its devastated military-industrial complexes, including the missile production and nuclear installations.
Then, there is the nuclear issue.
Speakers
1speaker12%attributed speech480writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageTrump
65 attributed words100% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.