Author summary
23% 1 analyzed article/video 1,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ibrahim al-Assil results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 332 hits . Analysis detected 2,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,542 of 6,625 authors). This Ibrahim al-Assil is better (less manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Ibrahim al-Assil
Author details
Total words: 5,946
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst