Topic summary
45% 6 analyzed articles/videos 10,748 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle East And North Africa results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 4,686 hits . Analysis detected 36,719 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,992 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,724 of 15,414 topics). This Middle East And North Africa is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group. Middle East And North Africa
Topic details
Total words: 42,992
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles43K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst