Topic summary
⁠90%4 analyzed articles/videos1,861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miami results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 987 hits. Analysis detected 11,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,507 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (6,865 of 15,769 topics). This Miami is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Miami
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,507
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos