Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rob Freeman results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,536 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Rob Freeman is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Rob Freeman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Rob Freeman (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,872
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.8%6.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos