Topic summary
63% 17 analyzed articles/videos 11,512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medicaid results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 5,486 hits . Analysis detected 46,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,388 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (13,741 of 15,844 topics). This Medicaid is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Medicaid
Topic details
Total words: 53,388
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score17 analyzed articles53.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst